Motivation
Markov’s inequality uses only the mean. Chebyshev’s inequality uses both mean and variance to get stronger bounds on deviations.
Statement
For any random variable X with finite mean μ and finite variance σ2:
P(∣X−μ∣≥kσ)≤k21
for any k>0.
P(∣X−μ∣≥a)≤a2σ2
Proof
Apply Markov’s inequality to (X−μ)2, which is non-negative with mean σ2:
P(∣X−μ∣≥a)=P((X−μ)2≥a2)≤a2E[(X−μ)2]=a2σ2
Substitute a=kσ:
P(∣X−μ∣≥kσ)≤k2σ2σ2=k21
Interpretation
| k | P(∣X−μ∣≥kσ) |
|-----|----------------------------|
| 1 | ≤1 (useless bound) |
| 2 | ≤0.25 |
| 3 | ≤0.11 |
For ANY distribution (with finite variance), at most 25% of values lie beyond 2 standard deviations from the mean, and at most 11% beyond 3 standard deviations.
Compare to normal: For N(μ,σ2), P(∣X−μ∣≥2σ)≈0.05 and P(∣X−μ∣≥3σ)≈0.003. Chebyshev gives worst-case bounds.
Visualisation

Example
Test scores have mean 70 and variance 100 (SD = 10). What proportion might score below 50 or above 90?
∣X−70∣≥20=2σ.
P(∣X−70∣≥20)≤41
At most 25% can be more than 20 points from the mean.
For a normal distribution, this would be about 5%: Chebyshev is conservative.
Example: Sample Mean
Let Xˉn=n1∑i=1nXi where Xi are i.i.d. with mean μ and variance σ2.
E[Xˉn]=μ and Var(Xˉn)=σ2/n.
P(∣Xˉn−μ∣≥ϵ)≤ϵ2σ2/n=nϵ2σ2
This decays as n→∞: the sample mean concentrates around μ.
One-Sided Chebyshev
For P(X−μ≥a) (one direction only), we can use:
P(X−μ≥a)≤σ2+a2σ2
Better than two-sided Chebyshev of σ2/a2 when a/σ<1.
Comparison with Markov
| Inequality | Information Required | Bound |
|---|
| Markov | E[X], X≥0 | P(X≥a)≤E[X]/a |
| Chebyshev | E[X], Var(X) | $P( |
Chebyshev is stronger but requires variance (and is symmetric about the mean).
Application: Proving Convergence
Given ϵ>0 and n samples:
P(∣Xˉn−μ∣≥ϵ)≤nϵ2σ2
For any ϵ>0, choose N>σ2/ϵ2⋅δ to ensure P(∣Xˉn−μ∣≥ϵ)<δ for all n≥N.
Summary
| Property | Statement |
|---|
| Condition | Finite μ and σ2 |
| Inequality | $P( |
| Alternative | $P( |
| Strength | Works for any distribution |
| Weakness | Often conservative |