The Need for Axioms
Intuitively, probability measures “how likely” an event is. But intuition can mislead. The axioms provide a rigorous foundation, ensuring all probability calculations are consistent.
Kolmogorov’s Axioms
Let Ω be a sample space and F an event space. A probability measure P:F→[0,1] satisfies:
Axiom 1: Non-negativity
P(E)≥0 for all events E
Probabilities are never negative.
Axiom 2: Normalisation
P(Ω)=1
The certain event has probability 1. It always occurs.
Axiom 3: Additivity
For mutually exclusive events E1,E2,…:
P(⋃i=1∞Ei)=∑i=1∞P(Ei)
The probability of the union of disjoint events equals the sum of their probabilities.
For finite collections of mutually exclusive events:
P(E1∪E2∪⋯∪En)=P(E1)+P(E2)+⋯+P(En)
when all Ei∩Ej=∅ for i=j.
Consequences of the Axioms
Probability of the Empty Set
P(∅)=0
Proof: Ω and ∅ are mutually exclusive with Ω∪∅=Ω. By Axiom 3: P(Ω)=P(Ω)+P(∅), so P(∅)=0.
Probability of Complement
P(Ec)=1−P(E)
Proof: E and Ec partition Ω: E∪Ec=Ω and E∩Ec=∅. By additivity: P(Ω)=P(E)+P(Ec)=1, hence P(Ec)=1−P(E).
Probability Bounds
0≤P(E)≤1
The lower bound is Axiom 1. The upper bound follows from P(E)=1−P(Ec) and P(Ec)≥0.
Monotonicity
If E⊆F, then P(E)≤P(F).
Proof: Write F=E∪(F∖E) where these are disjoint. Then P(F)=P(E)+P(F∖E)≥P(E).
Inclusion-Exclusion for Two Events
P(E∪F)=P(E)+P(F)−P(E∩F)
Why subtract P(E∩F)? The sum P(E)+P(F) counts outcomes in E∩F twice. We correct by subtracting once.

Inclusion-Exclusion for Three Events
P(E∪F∪G)=P(E)+P(F)+P(G)−P(E∩F)−P(E∩G)−P(F∩G)+P(E∩F∩G)
The pattern: add singletons, subtract pairwise intersections, add triple intersections.
General Inclusion-Exclusion
For n events E1,E2,…,En:
P(⋃i=1nEi)=∑iP(Ei)−∑i<jP(Ei∩Ej)+∑i<j<kP(Ei∩Ej∩Ek)−⋯
Alternating signs: add, subtract, add, subtract, and so on.
Example: Card Drawing
Draw a card from a standard deck. Let:
- E = card is a heart
- F = card is an ace
P(E∪F)=P(E)+P(F)−P(E∩F)=5213+524−521=5216=134
Countable vs Uncountable
The axioms extend to countable unions, but not uncountable ones. For uncountable sample spaces (like R), we cannot assign positive probability to every singleton while maintaining total probability 1.
This motivates using probability density functions for continuous random variables rather than assigning probability to individual points.
Constructing Probability Measures
For finite sample spaces with equally likely outcomes:
P(E)=∣Ω∣∣E∣=total number of outcomesnumber of outcomes in E
This construction satisfies all axioms.
Example (fair die): Ω={1,2,3,4,5,6} with each outcome having probability 1/6. Event “even” has probability ∣{2,4,6}∣/6=3/6=1/2.
Summary
| Property | Formula |
|---|
| Certain event | P(Ω)=1 |
| Impossible event | P(∅)=0 |
| Complement | P(Ec)=1−P(E) |
| Union (2 events) | P(E∪F)=P(E)+P(F)−P(E∩F) |
| Monotonicity | E⊆F⇒P(E)≤P(F) |
| Bounds | 0≤P(E)≤1 |