Well-Foundedness
Minimal Elements
Definition
Let be a relation on . An element is minimal in if:
No element of is strictly below .
Distinction: Minimal vs Least
- Minimal: No element is below (local property)
- Least: is below every element of
A set can have multiple minimal elements but at most one least element.
Example
On with partial order given by divisibility:
- Minimal elements of are and
- No least element
Well-Founded Relations
Definition
A relation on is well-founded if every non-empty subset has a minimal element.
Equivalent Characterisation
is well-founded iff there is no infinite descending chain:
Proof:
: If such a chain exists, the set has no minimal element.
: If some has no minimal element, we can build a descending chain by repeatedly choosing smaller elements.
Examples
Well-Founded
- on : Every non-empty subset has a least element (well-order)
- on restricted to for any
- The “proper subterm” relation on finite trees
Not Well-Founded
- on : has no minimal element
- on : has no minimal element
- on : any unbounded-below subset
Well-Orders
Definition
A well-order is a well-founded total order.
Every non-empty subset has a unique least element.
Examples
- is a well-order
- is NOT a well-order
- Any finite totally ordered set is a well-order
Properties
If is a well-order, then:
- Every non-empty subset has a unique least element
- For each , the set is well-ordered
- Principle of induction applies (see next section)
The Axiom of Foundation
In ZF set theory, the Axiom of Foundation states that is well-founded on any set.
This prohibits infinite descending -chains:
Summary
- is minimal in if no element of is below
- is well-founded if every non-empty subset has a minimal element
- Equivalent: no infinite descending chains
- on is well-founded; on or is not
- A well-order is a well-founded total order