Skip to content
Part IA Michaelmas, Lent Term

Equivalence Relations and Partitions

Equivalence Relations

Definition

A relation EE on AA is an equivalence relation if it is:

  1. Reflexive: aA.aEa\forall a \in A. aEa
  2. Symmetric: a,bA.(aEbbEa)\forall a, b \in A. (aEb \Rightarrow bEa)
  3. Transitive: a,b,cA.(aEbbEcaEc)\forall a, b, c \in A. (aEb \land bEc \Rightarrow aEc)

Equivalence Classes

The equivalence class of aa under EE is:

[a]E={bA:aEb}[a]_E = \{b \in A : aEb\}

Examples

RelationEquivalence Classes
a=ba = b on any setSingletons {a}\{a\} for each aa
Congruence mod nn{0,n,2n,},{1,n+1,},\{0, n, 2n, \ldots\}, \{1, n+1, \ldots\}, \ldots
“Same parity” on Z\mathbb{Z}{even integers}, {odd integers}
Universal relation A×AA \times ASingle class containing all of AA

Partitions

Definition

A partition PP of AA is a collection of non-empty, pairwise disjoint subsets whose union is AA:

  1. BP.B\forall B \in P. B \neq \emptyset
  2. B1,B2P.(B1B2B1B2=)\forall B_1, B_2 \in P. (B_1 \neq B_2 \Rightarrow B_1 \cap B_2 = \emptyset)
  3. BPB=A\bigcup_{B \in P} B = A

The elements of a partition are called blocks.

Examples

  • {{1,2},{3},{4,5,6}}\{\{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{4, 5, 6\}\} is a partition of {1,2,3,4,5,6}\{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\}
  • {{1},{2},{3}}\{\{1\}, \{2\}, \{3\}\} is a partition of {1,2,3}\{1, 2, 3\}
  • {{evens},{odds}}\{\{\text{evens}\}, \{\text{odds}\}\} is a partition of Z\mathbb{Z}

Examinable Proof: Bijection between Equivalence Relations and Partitions

Theorem: There is a natural bijection Φ:EqRel(A)Part(A)\Phi : \text{EqRel}(A) \cong \text{Part}(A).

From Equivalence Relation to Partition

Given an equivalence relation EE, define:

Φ(E)={[a]E:aA}\Phi(E) = \{[a]_E : a \in A\}

Well-defined: The equivalence classes form a partition.

  • Non-empty: a[a]Ea \in [a]_E by reflexivity
  • Disjoint: If b[a]E[a]Eb \in [a]_E \cap [a']_E, then aEbaEb and aEba'Eb. By symmetry and transitivity, aEaaEa', so [a]E=[a]E[a]_E = [a']_E.
  • Covering: Every aa is in its own class

From Partition to Equivalence Relation

Given a partition PP, define:

Φ1(P)={(a,b):BP.aBbB}\Phi^{-1}(P) = \{(a, b) : \exists B \in P. a \in B \land b \in B\}

Well-defined: This is an equivalence relation.

  • Reflexive: aa is in exactly one block BB, so (a,a)Φ1(P)(a, a) \in \Phi^{-1}(P)
  • Symmetric: If a,bBa, b \in B, then b,aBb, a \in B
  • Transitive: If a,bBa, b \in B and b,cBb, c \in B', then bBBb \in B \cap B'. Since blocks are disjoint, B=BB = B', so a,cBa, c \in B.

Inverses

Φ1(Φ(E))=E\Phi^{-1}(\Phi(E)) = E: aΦ1(Φ(E))ba \Phi^{-1}(\Phi(E)) b iff a,ba, b are in the same equivalence class of EE, iff aEbaEb.

Φ(Φ1(P))=P\Phi(\Phi^{-1}(P)) = P: The blocks of Φ(Φ1(P))\Phi(\Phi^{-1}(P)) are the equivalence classes under “in same block of PP”, which are the blocks themselves.

Key Step Explanation

The single crucial fact: every aAa \in A lies in exactly one block of PP.

  • No fewer (blocks cover AA)
  • No more (blocks are disjoint)

This drives both directions of the proof.

Quotient Set

The quotient A/EA / E is the set of equivalence classes:

A/E={[a]E:aA}A / E = \{[a]_E : a \in A\}

Canonical Map

π:AA/E\pi : A \to A/E sends aa to [a]E[a]_E.

This is the universal surjection associated with EE.


Summary

  • Equivalence relations: reflexive, symmetric, transitive
  • Partitions: non-empty, disjoint blocks covering AA
  • Bijection: E{[a]E}E \mapsto \{[a]_E\} and P{(a,b):a,b in same block}P \mapsto \{(a, b) : a, b \text{ in same block}\}
  • Quotient A/EA/E is the set of equivalence classes