Skip to content
Part IA Michaelmas, Lent Term

Implication and Direct Proof

The Implication Connective

An implication is a statement of the form “If PP, then QQ”, written PQP \Rightarrow Q.

  • PP is the antecedent (or hypothesis, premise)
  • QQ is the consequent (or conclusion)

Truth Table

PPQQPQP \Rightarrow Q
TTT
TFF
FTT
FFT

The implication PQP \Rightarrow Q is false only when PP is true and QQ is false.

Vacuous Truth

When PP is false, the implication PQP \Rightarrow Q is true regardless of QQ. This is called vacuous truth.

Example: “If 0=10 = 1, then pigs fly” is true (vacuously).

Logical Equivalences

Contrapositive

The contrapositive of PQP \Rightarrow Q is ¬Q¬P\neg Q \Rightarrow \neg P.

Theorem: An implication is logically equivalent to its contrapositive: PQ¬Q¬PP \Rightarrow Q \equiv \neg Q \Rightarrow \neg P

Converse

The converse of PQP \Rightarrow Q is QPQ \Rightarrow P.

Important: The converse is NOT equivalent to the original. Proving the converse does not prove the original implication.

PPQQPQP \Rightarrow QQPQ \Rightarrow P
TTTT
TFFT
FTTF
FFTT

Inverse

The inverse of PQP \Rightarrow Q is ¬P¬Q\neg P \Rightarrow \neg Q.

Important: The inverse is equivalent to the converse (not to the original).

Proof Strategies for Implication

Method 1: Direct Proof

To prove PQP \Rightarrow Q:

  1. Assume PP is true
  2. Using logical steps, derive QQ

Method 2: Proof by Contrapositive

To prove PQP \Rightarrow Q:

  1. Assume ¬Q\neg Q is true
  2. Using logical steps, derive ¬P\neg P

The contrapositive is useful when ¬Q\neg Q provides a “stronger” starting point than PP.

Example: Direct Proof

Statement: If nn is even, then n2n^2 is even.

Direct proof:

  1. Assume nn is even
  2. Then n=2kn = 2k for some integer kk
  3. So n2=(2k)2=4k2=2(2k2)n^2 = (2k)^2 = 4k^2 = 2(2k^2)
  4. Since 2k22k^2 is an integer, n2n^2 is even

Example: Proof by Contrapositive

Statement: If n2n^2 is even, then nn is even.

Contrapositive: If nn is odd, then n2n^2 is odd.

Proof:

  1. Assume nn is odd
  2. Then n=2k+1n = 2k + 1 for some integer kk
  3. So n2=(2k+1)2=4k2+4k+1=2(2k2+2k)+1n^2 = (2k+1)^2 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1 = 2(2k^2 + 2k) + 1
  4. Since 2k2+2k2k^2 + 2k is an integer, n2=2m+1n^2 = 2m + 1 for some integer mm
  5. Therefore n2n^2 is odd

By the contrapositive, if n2n^2 is even, then nn is even.

Combining Implications

Transitivity

If PQP \Rightarrow Q and QRQ \Rightarrow R, then PRP \Rightarrow R.

Hypothetical Syllogism

From PQP \Rightarrow Q and QRQ \Rightarrow R, conclude PRP \Rightarrow R.

Common Pitfalls

Confusing Converse and Implication

Trap: Proving QPQ \Rightarrow P does not prove PQP \Rightarrow Q.

Example: “If x>5x > 5, then x>3x > 3” is true. Its converse “If x>3x > 3, then x>5x > 5” is false (consider x=4x = 4).

Assuming the Conclusion

Trap: When proving PQP \Rightarrow Q, do not assume QQ at the start. This is circular reasoning.

Forgetting the Antecedent

Trap: When proving PQP \Rightarrow Q, you must begin by assuming PP. If you forget this, your proof structure is incorrect.

Multiple Antecedents

Implications can have multiple antecedents:

P1P2P3QP_1 \land P_2 \land P_3 \Rightarrow Q

To prove this:

  1. Assume all of P1P_1, P2P_2, P3P_3
  2. Derive QQ

Summary

  • PQP \Rightarrow Q means “if PP then QQ
  • The contrapositive ¬Q¬P\neg Q \Rightarrow \neg P is logically equivalent
  • The converse QPQ \Rightarrow P is NOT equivalent
  • Direct proof: assume PP, derive QQ
  • Proof by contrapositive: assume ¬Q\neg Q, derive ¬P\neg P