Implication and Direct Proof
The Implication Connective
An implication is a statement of the form “If , then ”, written .
- is the antecedent (or hypothesis, premise)
- is the consequent (or conclusion)
Truth Table
| T | T | T |
| T | F | F |
| F | T | T |
| F | F | T |
The implication is false only when is true and is false.
Vacuous Truth
When is false, the implication is true regardless of . This is called vacuous truth.
Example: “If , then pigs fly” is true (vacuously).
Logical Equivalences
Contrapositive
The contrapositive of is .
Theorem: An implication is logically equivalent to its contrapositive:
Converse
The converse of is .
Important: The converse is NOT equivalent to the original. Proving the converse does not prove the original implication.
| T | T | T | T |
| T | F | F | T |
| F | T | T | F |
| F | F | T | T |
Inverse
The inverse of is .
Important: The inverse is equivalent to the converse (not to the original).
Proof Strategies for Implication
Method 1: Direct Proof
To prove :
- Assume is true
- Using logical steps, derive
Method 2: Proof by Contrapositive
To prove :
- Assume is true
- Using logical steps, derive
The contrapositive is useful when provides a “stronger” starting point than .
Example: Direct Proof
Statement: If is even, then is even.
Direct proof:
- Assume is even
- Then for some integer
- So
- Since is an integer, is even
Example: Proof by Contrapositive
Statement: If is even, then is even.
Contrapositive: If is odd, then is odd.
Proof:
- Assume is odd
- Then for some integer
- So
- Since is an integer, for some integer
- Therefore is odd
By the contrapositive, if is even, then is even.
Combining Implications
Transitivity
If and , then .
Hypothetical Syllogism
From and , conclude .
Common Pitfalls
Confusing Converse and Implication
Trap: Proving does not prove .
Example: “If , then ” is true. Its converse “If , then ” is false (consider ).
Assuming the Conclusion
Trap: When proving , do not assume at the start. This is circular reasoning.
Forgetting the Antecedent
Trap: When proving , you must begin by assuming . If you forget this, your proof structure is incorrect.
Multiple Antecedents
Implications can have multiple antecedents:
To prove this:
- Assume all of , ,
- Derive
Summary
- means “if then ”
- The contrapositive is logically equivalent
- The converse is NOT equivalent
- Direct proof: assume , derive
- Proof by contrapositive: assume , derive